Difference between revisions of "Talk: Years after Aegon's Conquest"

From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Most sections now empty will be filled)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:::I don't think you understand what I'm saying.  A time line, yes, fine idea.  That's not the problem.  But right now, this is a time line that looks ugly because there are dozens of empty sections which may well never be filled.  Not such a good idea.  Since it's relatively easy to add any further years as they come, my suggestion is to remove any empty years and wait till more information is released.  Do you see what I'm asking for now?  [[User:Mistermanticore|Mistermanticore]] 11:48, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
 
:::I don't think you understand what I'm saying.  A time line, yes, fine idea.  That's not the problem.  But right now, this is a time line that looks ugly because there are dozens of empty sections which may well never be filled.  Not such a good idea.  Since it's relatively easy to add any further years as they come, my suggestion is to remove any empty years and wait till more information is released.  Do you see what I'm asking for now?  [[User:Mistermanticore|Mistermanticore]] 11:48, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::::I understood what you wanted, but I  think that a lot of empty section will be filled. And that is why I want to keep them and have the chance to fill them. Like I said, if after some time there are still empty then we can remove those. I think the only from year 1 to 120 will be a bit hard, I think the others will be filled very soon. [[User:Scafloc|Scafloc]] 15:52, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
 
::::I understood what you wanted, but I  think that a lot of empty section will be filled. And that is why I want to keep them and have the chance to fill them. Like I said, if after some time there are still empty then we can remove those. I think the only from year 1 to 120 will be a bit hard, I think the others will be filled very soon. [[User:Scafloc|Scafloc]] 15:52, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
 +
:::::Well, when you can fill them, it's trivially simple to add in new sections.  But leaving them there now?  Just makes for an ugly page that I find more distracting than useful.  I'm in no hurry to do it today, but I do think it should be done.  ~~

Revision as of 23:51, 13 May 2007

Hmm, I'm looking at this page, and seeing a lot of rather ugly looking empty sections that I am doubtful will ever be meaningfully expanded. Might it be worth removing the empty ones and filling them later? Mistermanticore 16:41, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

That makes sense to me.-Oorag 18:41, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
I don't agree. I think it's a good idea to make some kind of timeline. Through it we can have a better understand of what happened in Westeros. So let's give it a chance for some time. If after that there are still a lot of empty sections (of one year) we could think about merging them in periods of 10 - 25 years. Scafloc 11:34, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
I don't think you understand what I'm saying. A time line, yes, fine idea. That's not the problem. But right now, this is a time line that looks ugly because there are dozens of empty sections which may well never be filled. Not such a good idea. Since it's relatively easy to add any further years as they come, my suggestion is to remove any empty years and wait till more information is released. Do you see what I'm asking for now? Mistermanticore 11:48, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
I understood what you wanted, but I think that a lot of empty section will be filled. And that is why I want to keep them and have the chance to fill them. Like I said, if after some time there are still empty then we can remove those. I think the only from year 1 to 120 will be a bit hard, I think the others will be filled very soon. Scafloc 15:52, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
Well, when you can fill them, it's trivially simple to add in new sections. But leaving them there now? Just makes for an ugly page that I find more distracting than useful. I'm in no hurry to do it today, but I do think it should be done. ~~