Difference between revisions of "Talk: Aegon Targaryen (son of Rhaegar)"

From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fact vs Unconfirmed)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
Roxy, if you disagree please provide adequate reason before editing. Let's hash out why it is 100% confirmed this is Aegon and the article should reflect that and only that. If you do not possess 100% proof that Varys and Illyrio and their pet Blackfyre army are not part of some game of thrones, perhaps you should drop this and stop vandalizing the article every few weeks.  [[User:Benethon Stark|Benethon Stark]] 22:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 
Roxy, if you disagree please provide adequate reason before editing. Let's hash out why it is 100% confirmed this is Aegon and the article should reflect that and only that. If you do not possess 100% proof that Varys and Illyrio and their pet Blackfyre army are not part of some game of thrones, perhaps you should drop this and stop vandalizing the article every few weeks.  [[User:Benethon Stark|Benethon Stark]] 22:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
:Let's start with assuming that all edits are made in [[w:Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good faith]]: the wish to improve the wiki. Difference of opinion are just that and should not be seen as malice. But it is clear that in discussions we need to come up with arguments.[[User:Scafloc|Scafloc]] 22:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:33, 10 March 2013

i tried to flesh out the article, as we have references to Aegon from many different characters across five books. The hard part is to determine who claims what. If I have missed something important, please point it out. --Dimadick 17:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Yikes, this article has spiraled way out of control. I'm not sure it's necessary to include every minute reference to or conjecture about the character. The grammar and syntax need some clean up too. I'd be happy to help but I think a lot of trimming needs to be done. --Citizen_snips 02:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

The articles are supposed to include the known information about characters. The forum already includes several discussions were readers were unable to recall the necessary information on the character, and I think it was about time the article helped out with that.

What conjecture? Currently the article consists of information from the novels, and excludes theories on this character. Someone else can cover these theories.

I will see what I can I do about correcting my own grammar. --Dimadick 08:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Fact vs Unconfirmed

I feel the article should continue to demonstrate that Aegon's current status is an unconfirmed situation. Namely that no proof has been provided that Young Griff is actually Aegon, an undoubtedly his origin and fate will be further expanded on. Thus, until it is resolved, the article should reflect that ambiguous situation (which is already does technically, but Roxy insists on editing just one aspect of it for some unknown reason). For example, the alias, the main picture used, etc, was challenged before and have remained. Roxy has not bothered to edit those.

Roxy, if you disagree please provide adequate reason before editing. Let's hash out why it is 100% confirmed this is Aegon and the article should reflect that and only that. If you do not possess 100% proof that Varys and Illyrio and their pet Blackfyre army are not part of some game of thrones, perhaps you should drop this and stop vandalizing the article every few weeks. Benethon Stark 22:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Let's start with assuming that all edits are made in good faith: the wish to improve the wiki. Difference of opinion are just that and should not be seen as malice. But it is clear that in discussions we need to come up with arguments.Scafloc 22:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)