Difference between revisions of "Talk: Faith of the Seven"

From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Oorag, I see that you stripped out some of the details that I imported directly for the Concordance, and I certainly have no qualms about your re-organization (reasonable people can disagr...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Oorag, I see that you stripped out some of the details that I imported directly for the Concordance, and I certainly have no qualms about your re-organization (reasonable people can disagree and all that) but I am wondering why you would remove information since the point of creating our own wiki is go bonkers and festoon the articles with as much relevant detail as possible, free of the editorial constraints of a general wikipedia article? --[[User:Daena the defiant|Daena the defiant]] 18:42, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
 
Oorag, I see that you stripped out some of the details that I imported directly for the Concordance, and I certainly have no qualms about your re-organization (reasonable people can disagree and all that) but I am wondering why you would remove information since the point of creating our own wiki is go bonkers and festoon the articles with as much relevant detail as possible, free of the editorial constraints of a general wikipedia article? --[[User:Daena the defiant|Daena the defiant]] 18:42, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
 +
:Don't know. I did a lot of reorganizing so some stuff might have been lost in the shuffle. I can't compare the changes because of the name jump, but I might have edited some things down by trying to say the same thing in fewer words. If you think some relevant information was cut, feel free to put it back in. -[[User:Oorag|Oorag]] 19:49, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
==Sourcing==
 +
Is this article copied in part or in whole from Wikipedia? If so, please see about attributing that correctly. --[[User:Ran|Ran]] 08:25, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 13:25, 26 April 2007

Oorag, I see that you stripped out some of the details that I imported directly for the Concordance, and I certainly have no qualms about your re-organization (reasonable people can disagree and all that) but I am wondering why you would remove information since the point of creating our own wiki is go bonkers and festoon the articles with as much relevant detail as possible, free of the editorial constraints of a general wikipedia article? --Daena the defiant 18:42, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Don't know. I did a lot of reorganizing so some stuff might have been lost in the shuffle. I can't compare the changes because of the name jump, but I might have edited some things down by trying to say the same thing in fewer words. If you think some relevant information was cut, feel free to put it back in. -Oorag 19:49, 25 April 2007 (CDT)

Sourcing

Is this article copied in part or in whole from Wikipedia? If so, please see about attributing that correctly. --Ran 08:25, 26 April 2007 (CDT)