Difference between revisions of "Talk: Joy Hill"

From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Jump to: navigation, search
(Legitimation)
m (Legitimation)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::I've meant it more generally. Joy was also part of a marriage pact to the Westerlings. --[[User:Exodianecross|Exodianecross]] 14:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 
::I've meant it more generally. Joy was also part of a marriage pact to the Westerlings. --[[User:Exodianecross|Exodianecross]] 14:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 
:::That's Jaime's interpretation of it all. Whether Jaime is correct here, is the question, as we know that Joy had already been promised to another.--[[User:Rhaenys_Targaryen|Rhaenys_Targaryen]] 14:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 
:::That's Jaime's interpretation of it all. Whether Jaime is correct here, is the question, as we know that Joy had already been promised to another.--[[User:Rhaenys_Targaryen|Rhaenys_Targaryen]] 14:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 +
Yes, that's true. But it's generally better to have someone with a "true name" and not a "bastard name" for marriages to offer. --[[User:Exodianecross|Exodianecross]] 14:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:46, 1 March 2015

Legitimation

Why wasn't Joy legitimized, by King Joffrey or Tommen? It's sure that "Joy Lannister" would be better for a marriage pact than "Joy Hill". --Exodianecross 13:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Legitimizing a bastard (Joy) that you plan to marry to another bastard (one of Walder Frey's bastard sons) will only bring trouble. --Rhaenys_Targaryen 14:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I've meant it more generally. Joy was also part of a marriage pact to the Westerlings. --Exodianecross 14:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
That's Jaime's interpretation of it all. Whether Jaime is correct here, is the question, as we know that Joy had already been promised to another.--Rhaenys_Targaryen 14:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, that's true. But it's generally better to have someone with a "true name" and not a "bastard name" for marriages to offer. --Exodianecross 14:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)