Difference between revisions of "User talk:Potsk"

From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Jump to: navigation, search
(Predecessor and Successor)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
I've seen you added a predecessor and successor module on the infobox for characters. I'm not opposed to it but I'm not a fan of the "eventually X succeed Y" stuff. I think we should use these modules for direct successions only. Have a good day. --[[User:Thomaerys Velaryon|Thomaerys Velaryon]] ([[User talk:Thomaerys Velaryon|talk]]) 12:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 
I've seen you added a predecessor and successor module on the infobox for characters. I'm not opposed to it but I'm not a fan of the "eventually X succeed Y" stuff. I think we should use these modules for direct successions only. Have a good day. --[[User:Thomaerys Velaryon|Thomaerys Velaryon]] ([[User talk:Thomaerys Velaryon|talk]]) 12:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 
:It is the most effective use for navigational purposes. --[[User:Potsk|Potsk]] ([[User talk:Potsk|talk]]) 12:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 
:It is the most effective use for navigational purposes. --[[User:Potsk|Potsk]] ([[User talk:Potsk|talk]]) 12:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 +
::I absolutely agree with Thomaerys. It is confusing and "eventual predecessor" does not make any sense in my opinion. There are navigation boxes at the bottom of the page for navigational purposes. It is better to have a discussion about things like that with other editors before changing it on your own. [[User:The Wondering Wolf|The Wondering Wolf]] ([[User talk:The Wondering Wolf|talk]]) 13:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:09, 27 December 2020

Please see answer

Predecessor and Successor

Hello Potsk,

I've seen you added a predecessor and successor module on the infobox for characters. I'm not opposed to it but I'm not a fan of the "eventually X succeed Y" stuff. I think we should use these modules for direct successions only. Have a good day. --Thomaerys Velaryon (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

It is the most effective use for navigational purposes. --Potsk (talk) 12:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
I absolutely agree with Thomaerys. It is confusing and "eventual predecessor" does not make any sense in my opinion. There are navigation boxes at the bottom of the page for navigational purposes. It is better to have a discussion about things like that with other editors before changing it on your own. The Wondering Wolf (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)