Talk: Kitten theory
From A Wiki of Ice and Fire
Clearly a subject for a doctoral dissertation, not the wiki. Francisco Araujo da Costa 19:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- As the philosopher Bernard Williams pointed out, when a writer begins a sentence with words such as "clearly," it's a fairly reliable sign that they have no argument. Ser_Spock 23:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- If the page is really intended for philophical analyses you should add references. And original research is not allowed. Scafloc 03:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Also Theeory pages are ment for (sourced) speculation. So it should also go another article but you can begin with adding notes and references.Scafloc 03:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- If the page is really intended for philophical analyses you should add references. And original research is not allowed. Scafloc 03:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- As the philosopher Bernard Williams pointed out, when a writer begins a sentence with words such as "clearly," it's a fairly reliable sign that they have no argument. Ser_Spock 23:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- The purpose of the page isn't philosophical analysis, but rather describing a popular interpretive strategy that many fans are using. Ser_Spock 04:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Then references should be added proving it is popular and that "many people are using". Also can you argue why it is notable. And usually on a wiki we only add a reverence for this. (This/that critic said that etc). Why should your strategy merit an article?Scafloc
- Can you give me a page to which I might compare the kitten theory work? After looking through theory pages (e.g. Jon Snow), none of them source claims as you're demanding I do here. I need some sort of point of comparison. Ser_Spock 13:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
- Then references should be added proving it is popular and that "many people are using". Also can you argue why it is notable. And usually on a wiki we only add a reverence for this. (This/that critic said that etc). Why should your strategy merit an article?Scafloc
- The purpose of the page isn't philosophical analysis, but rather describing a popular interpretive strategy that many fans are using. Ser_Spock 04:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
This page is hilarious! --SerKeplan 12:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)