User: Marco: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, I "decide this". People are looking for articles, not your 50 irrelevant quotes on Robb Stark, and I certainly don't need to ask your permission before I edit. You are correct; I really ''don't'' care how many hours you've contributed. Do you think you are the only one? Perhaps you feel as though I removed some of those quotes out of spite. This is not the case. My goal (and hopefully yours) is to streamline and make sure these articles (particularly the popular ones) are of a constant (and high) standard. That does not involve endless, out of context quotes. Now, dry your tears. | Yes, I "decide this". People are looking for articles, not your 50 irrelevant quotes on Robb Stark, and I certainly don't need to ask your permission before I edit. You are correct; I really ''don't'' care how many hours you've contributed. Do you think you are the only one? Perhaps you feel as though I removed some of those quotes out of spite. This is not the case. My goal (and hopefully yours) is to streamline and make sure these articles (particularly the popular ones) are of a constant (and high) standard. That does not involve endless, out of context quotes. Now, dry your tears. | ||
I'm ignorant? You're an idiot. Go back to watching the TV show kid. Thank you for pointing out Stannis, however, that is an article that needs attention. Look at the quotes you have for Robb - 3 of them say effectively the same thing (he's won the battles but losing the war). Are they needed? Not really. Look at the quotes that I have left. They do the same job. Do you understand that I'm not trying to "fight" you? | |||
Revision as of 10:50, 12 August 2013
How many quotes does a page need? There were far too many.
Yes, I "decide this". People are looking for articles, not your 50 irrelevant quotes on Robb Stark, and I certainly don't need to ask your permission before I edit. You are correct; I really don't care how many hours you've contributed. Do you think you are the only one? Perhaps you feel as though I removed some of those quotes out of spite. This is not the case. My goal (and hopefully yours) is to streamline and make sure these articles (particularly the popular ones) are of a constant (and high) standard. That does not involve endless, out of context quotes. Now, dry your tears.
I'm ignorant? You're an idiot. Go back to watching the TV show kid. Thank you for pointing out Stannis, however, that is an article that needs attention. Look at the quotes you have for Robb - 3 of them say effectively the same thing (he's won the battles but losing the war). Are they needed? Not really. Look at the quotes that I have left. They do the same job. Do you understand that I'm not trying to "fight" you?